The Opposition Party Bleachers

By Logan Dean Symington

I'd say I am fairly street smart, not so much as I have grown up in a small town like city. but "swearing" isn't using your brain at all, when I get really angry I don't swear at all and that is the time when I can be the MOST offensive. There are people who swear every second word and that's is just filler. Talk is cheap because supply exceeds demand, people talk, but they don't say anything, swearing just adds to this supply of useless words, I used to work as a waiter, they would give you a list of words to use to make the food sound more appealing, center cut, fresh, tasty, crip, after a while the words meant nothing to me, I don't like that, words should mean something. If you say ANYTHING enough it loses it's meaning. Swear words can mostly be used to offend people or show anger, or suprise, you might say swearing is a reaction to people or events not actually thoughts, there for I say it is You how is the one not thinking not I, and if you wish to debate the issue, attack the issue not me, A.S. you infected cum bubble. And have a nice day. :)

By Adam Schirmacher

By: Rachelle King on 4/3/02; 10:19:27 PM >Of course, this is coming from a poet whose work can not be understood by the >likes of you. I don't actually think you put much effort or thought into your >attacks on people, maybe you should write a poem expressing your inner >feelings of inadaquacy that you project on others to make yourself feel better.

Two words: Fuck You! As in I hate hearing that kind of shit. You talk about my personal attacks right before calling me inadequate. I put plenty of damned effort into everything I do, so thanks for all the respect. Thanks for the nice fucking warm welcome. That's the damned close to worst thing anyone's said to me on here, and probably for a long time anywhere. I don't have feelings of inadequacy, and you're certainly not any self-esteem booster for anyone who does.

As for Brian Carnell, yah, we debate plenty. But I have more respect for him than I do for most people on here. Every time there is something new to argue about, I don't connect him in any way to any other debates. I'm not aware what goes on in his brain, but as far as I know he shows me the respect I deserve.

Mark-I know I have quite random posts, but I never realized there was a system or pattern as to what content I'm supposed to post. As far as the debate on seizures-honestly, I was trying to keep it about Mr. Woolley's suicide and who should get the blame. In most of my work I do put a little of me in it, of how I feel. It's often shadowed. For instance, in my poem about going to hell and ending up questioning my sanity, my point wasn't just a random story. It meant that I have a deep fear of not being sane, and a deep fear of hell.

By terry nelson

alright i just the little problem between adam and rachel and i know adam and he shouldn't be sorry any word he said rachel you don't now him you can't judge him that severly through one little thing so you better take your ass back to that slut corner you came from and think about what you said.

now how do you feel about that i hope pretty crappy because you like adam said were contridicting yourself in you r little speech because attacked him just as much maybe more then hes attacked anyone in this little discussion. yes he can kind of not really cocky but more sarcastic so stop attacking people about one reply.