voices logo top'obeisances before the written word'
spvoices logo bottomWritings  Discussion Authors Help Search Home
You are here: Home >> Discussion Group >> Writings and Talkbacks >> INsignificant

Discussion Group

INsignificant

< < Macs are still better Up the mainstream! > >


INsignificant
By: Ginny Davis on 10/13/2001; 9:09 PM



Reply | Bookmark this post
Enclosures: None.

RE: INsignificant
By: Kaju Sarkar on 9/3/2001; 12:57 PM

WELCOME !!

Reply | Bookmark this post
Enclosures: None.

Re: INsignificant
By: Mark Morgan on 9/3/2001; 1:06 PM

Ginny! Welcome to Unreason. I'll get you published when I dig out
some time to burn through all the backlog of published works,
probably in the next couple of days.

Another friend of the Castdragons, hmm? Glad to have you here.

Reply | Bookmark this post
Enclosures: None.

RE: INsignificant
By: The Great Washu on 9/3/2001; 7:12 PM

Ill come out of hiding just long enough to say "welcome ginny! and nice poem..."

Reply | Bookmark this post
Enclosures: None.

RE: INsignificant
By: Evan on 9/3/2001; 9:04 PM

I like this poem. It expresses the emotions of being the runner up very clearly. Also, if you are actually feeling this way, it is my generally policy to hunt you down and cheer you up. Consider that without people who placed lower first place would be completely meaningless. Accomplishments would not be possible without runners up. Also a lesser level of success can push one to greater heights than before.

Reply | Bookmark this post
Enclosures: None.

RE: INsignificant
By: Kaju Sarkar on 9/3/2001; 9:49 PM

YO yo yo !! PJ welcome back man ..i'm th eone being ur aunt by the way ..just wanted to tell u that

Reply | Bookmark this post
Enclosures: None.

RE: INsignificant
By: Jena Moore on 9/4/2001; 3:29 PM

Ginny... yay! Finally a person who understands and enjoys all things having to do with sugar and being hyper! Boogachoo and Greetings! (by the way... loved your poem!)

Reply | Bookmark this post
Enclosures: None.

RE: INsignificant
By: Dorothy Marie on 9/9/2001; 6:03 PM

Wow, Ginny. This is amazing. I love this poem. :)

Reply | Bookmark this post
Enclosures: None.

RE: INsignificant
By: Chie Theresa Fujioka on 9/13/2001; 11:34 PM

hey gin

i think we are both second place...

no?

but hey, there are many races to run.

Reply | Bookmark this post
Enclosures: None.

RE: INsignificant
By: Chie Theresa Fujioka on 3/31/2002; 8:02 AM

er.. where did it go? it was well written

Reply | Bookmark this post
Enclosures: None.

RE: INsignificant
By: Adam Schirmacher on 3/31/2002; 10:28 AM

Where did it go?

Reply | Bookmark this post
Enclosures: None.

RE: INsignificant
By: Mark Morgan on 3/31/2002; 12:21 PM

For reasons she never shared with me, Ginny wrote one day and asked me to remove everything.

I hate it when that happens, but I respect everyone's right to control what they put here.

Reply | Bookmark this post
Enclosures: None.

RE: INsignificant
By: Chie Theresa Fujioka on 3/31/2002; 6:49 PM

I have a hunch why.

I respect that too. But in a way it makes me feel lonely. hugs gingin

Reply | Bookmark this post
Enclosures: None.

RE: INsignificant
By: Brian Carnell on 3/31/2002; 7:28 PM

At 12:37 PM 3/31/2002 -0500, Mark wrote:

>On the web: Msg #: http://www.voicesofunreason.com/fullthread$5478#VU5478
>
>For reasons she never shared with me, Ginny wrote one day and asked me to
>remove everything.
>
>I hate it when that happens, but I respect everyone's right to control
>what they put here.

Wow! I have people all the time who e-mail me wanting me to publish their
stuff and that sort of thing is the reason why I almost always say no.



Reply | Bookmark this post
Enclosures: None.

RE: INsignificant
By: Mark Morgan on 4/1/2002; 12:10 AM

Wow! I have people all the time who e-mail me wanting me to publish their stuff and that sort of thing is the reason why I almost always say no.

One of the fantastic things about using a groupware tool for one's website is how easy it is for these things to take care of themselves. Ginny didn't have to e-mail me, she could have done it herself. At the present I'm experimenting with only allowing authors and admins edit things, and even then only items for publication. I haven't seen any of the nonsense you and other sites report of people changing their posts to make a replier look foolish, but it is nice that it's possible to stop that.

Reply | Bookmark this post
Enclosures: None.

RE: INsignificant
By: Adam Schirmacher on 4/1/2002; 1:21 AM

I think the admins etc. should be allowed to change a post to its original state.

Reply | Bookmark this post
Enclosures: None.

RE: INsignificant
By: Mark Morgan on 4/1/2002; 2:53 PM

I can, but I won't. All your writings belong to you, not me.

Reply | Bookmark this post
Enclosures: None.

RE: INsignificant
By: Brian Carnell on 4/1/2002; 3:26 PM

At 03:09 PM 4/1/02 -0500, you wrote:
>I can, but I won't. All your writings belong to you, not me.

Oh man, you missed the opportunity to say:

ALL YOUR WRITINGS ARE BELONG TO YOU!!!



Reply | Bookmark this post
Enclosures: None.

Re: INsignificant
By: Matthew Patterson on 4/1/2002; 9:10 PM

>> I can, but I won't. All your writings belong to you, not me.
>
> Oh man, you missed the opportunity to say:
>
> ALL YOUR WRITINGS ARE BELONG TO YOU!!!

WHAT YOU SAY???

And see, I was just managing to forget that spiel that I once had
memorized. Curse you, Carnell, to your dying day.



Reply | Bookmark this post
Enclosures: None.

RE: INsignificant
By: vanessa on 4/1/2002; 9:38 PM

i can't see it, where did it go, i really want to read it

Reply | Bookmark this post
Enclosures: None.

RE: INsignificant
By: ScottN on 4/1/2002; 10:02 PM

>> I can, but I won't. All your writings belong to you, not me. > > Oh man, you missed the opportunity to say: > > ALL YOUR WRITINGS ARE BELONG TO YOU!!!

WHAT YOU SAY???


SOMEONE SET US UP THE POST!

Reply | Bookmark this post
Enclosures: None.

RE: INsignificant
By: Brian Carnell on 4/1/2002; 10:27 PM

At 09:10 PM 4/1/2002 -0500, Matthew wrote:

> >> I can, but I won't. All your writings belong to you, not me.
> >
> > Oh man, you missed the opportunity to say:
> >
> > ALL YOUR WRITINGS ARE BELONG TO YOU!!!
>
>WHAT YOU SAY???
>
>And see, I was just managing to forget that spiel that I once had
>memorized. Curse you, Carnell, to your dying day.

Hey, the New York Times said there's not enough goofiness on the web
anymore (where's Mahir when you need him?), so I was just doing my part.



Reply | Bookmark this post
Enclosures: None.

RE: INsignificant
By: Chie Theresa Fujioka on 4/2/2002; 12:47 AM

> I can, but I won't. All your writings belong to you, not me. > > Oh man, you missed the opportunity to say: > > ALL YOUR WRITINGS ARE BELONG TO YOU!!!

WHAT YOU SAY???

SOMEONE SET US UP THE POST!

WE GET SIGNAL

Reply | Bookmark this post
Enclosures: None.

RE: INsignificant
By: Adam Schirmacher on 4/2/2002; 6:16 PM

How did you ever pass up that opportunity? Boo hoo hoo. It makes me cry to even think about it.

Reply | Bookmark this post
Enclosures: None.


E-mail address


Password



< < Macs are still better Up the mainstream! > >
 Login
Email address:
Password:
 
 Toolbox
 

top

Copyright Notice | Privacy Policy | Contact
Site Managed with Conversant